What ESG Really Means for Procurement and Supply Chain Managers

ESG is now a standard requirement in procurement and supply chain decision-making.

From pre-qualification questionnaires and tenders to supplier audits and contract reviews, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) criteria are shaping who organisations work with and how risk is managed across the supply chain.

Yet despite its prevalence, ESG is often poorly defined in practice. For procurement managers and supply chain leaders, this creates a real challenge: how to make commercially sound, defensible decisions based on information that will stand up to scrutiny over time.

At SQS, we work closely with procurement and supply chain teams operating in complex, regulated and global environments. One pattern is consistent: ESG risk rarely presents itself at contract award; it surfaces later, when the cost of getting it wrong is far higher.

What does ESG mean in a procurement and supply chain context?

ESG stands for Environmental, Social and Governance. In procurement terms, it is a framework for identifying, assessing and managing non-financial risk within supplier networks.

For procurement and supply chain managers, ESG is not about policy statements or ambition. It is about evidence, assurance and accountability — particularly when decisions are challenged internally, audited externally, or tested by incidents and disputes.

Environmental risk: where supply chain exposure often begins

The environmental element of ESG focuses on how suppliers manage their environmental impact and regulatory obligations.

In supply chains, this typically includes:

• Carbon emissions and energy use

• Waste management and material traceability

• Environmental permits, licences and compliance

• Climate resilience of suppliers, assets and logistics routes

A common issue for procurement teams is reliance on self-declared or outdated environmental data. While this may satisfy early-stage requirements, it often proves insufficient during audits or regulatory review.

Effective procurement teams ensure environmental risk is assessed early, verified where appropriate, and aligned with the lifecycle of the goods or services being procured.

Social risk: people, safety and supplier responsibility

The social component of ESG addresses how organisations manage their responsibilities to people — both within their own operations and across the supply chain.

Key areas of focus include:

• Health and safety performance

• Labour standards and working conditions

• Human rights and modern slavery controls

• Workforce competence and training

From a supply chain management perspective, social risk often remains hidden until an incident occurs. When it does, procurement decisions are scrutinised closely.

Robust supplier assurance processes help procurement managers demonstrate that appropriate checks were undertaken, risks were understood, and decisions were proportionate and justified.

Governance risk: the foundation of defensible procurement decisions

Governance is frequently the least visible aspect of ESG, yet it carries the greatest potential exposure for procurement and supply chain leaders.

Governance covers:

• Supplier oversight and approval processes

• Risk management and internal controls

• Transparency, reporting and record keeping

• Ethical conduct, compliance and accountability

When ESG issues escalate, the focus is rarely on operational detail alone. The critical question becomes: who approved the supplier, on what evidence, and with what level of independent verification.

Strong governance ensures procurement decisions can be clearly evidenced and defended — often years after the original contract was awarded.

Why ESG risk usually appears after contract award

One of the most consistent challenges we see is timing.

Typical gaps include:

• Supplier approvals based on incomplete or historic information

• ESG claims that cannot be substantiated during audit

• Verification or inspection activities taking place too late to influence commercial decisions

By the time these issues surface, organisations are often already contractually committed, operationally exposed, and reputationally at risk.

Integrating ESG into procurement decision points — rather than treating it as a reporting exercise — significantly reduces downstream risk.

What good ESG looks like in procurement and supply chain management

Effective ESG integration does not need to slow procurement down or add unnecessary complexity.

In practice, it involves:

• Aligning ESG checks with key procurement and supply chain decision stages

• Using independent verification where risk and complexity justify it

• Ensuring supplier information remains current and traceable

• Treating ESG as part of lifecycle risk management, not a standalone requirement

This approach enables procurement and supply chain managers to make decisions that are commercially sound, compliant, and defensible.

ESG as a supply chain assurance issue

At its core, ESG is a supply chain assurance challenge.

It is about understanding:

• Which risks are being accepted

• Which risks are being mitigated

• And which risks may be inherited unknowingly through suppliers

For organisations operating in infrastructure, energy, manufacturing and other asset-intensive sectors, ESG and supply chain assurance are now inseparable.

Final thought

For procurement and supply chain leaders, ESG is no longer optional — and it is no longer theoretical.

The organisations managing ESG most effectively are those that treat it as part of everyday procurement decision-making, supported by evidence, assurance and clear governance.

The goal is simple: to make procurement decisions today that still stand up to scrutiny tomorrow.

At SQS, we support procurement and supply chain teams with independent assurance, supplier verification and lifecycle risk management across global projects. Follow us for further insights on procurement risk, supply chain assurance and ESG.

Contact SQS